I remember reading John Gielgud's obit in the New York Times this spring, and near the end, he is quoted saying that among all of his roles, his Prospero in Prospero's Books was his most satisfying. Since I've always liked his acting, that sent me on the trail of this film.Wow! What a film! First, I highly recommend that you read The Tempest just prior to viewing this film, or at least be familiar with it--find a plot summary in a Shakespeare book. It will help in carrying you through the transitions, of which there are none in this film.Second, if you are the least bit squeamish about nudity, male and female, in films, pass over this one. You won't enjoy it for watching all the bodies.With that said, enjoy. What I found fascinating about the entire film is Greenaway's interpretation. I really don't agree with it all (three Ariel's, in different ages, play the sprite of fire and air), but he still pulls it off so that it works, and I credit him for that. Who knows? Maybe it was all a part of Prospero's imagination and infatuation with books.Further, it is a cinematic smorgasbord. The camera just cannot contain all the visuals.And then there's Gielgud, he really is smooth, polished, and enjoying himself. I loved watching his performance because he was putting in all the nuance, innuendo, and shades of meaning in the language, while presenting Prospero with all dignity.